In my opinion is not important the Moore’s life, Moore’s inspiration or Moore’s personality, and neither the title or the explanation of the piece (although many people give it a significance that I can not understand). What I enjoyed more was the piece of artistically cut nature to be part another time of the nature, its forms and its feelings. For this reason I think, maybe the problem that I have found in the exhibition of Caixa Forum is the situation of the pieces. Has it sense to put masterpieces with a natural soul between four walls? I believe that all samples are thought to be outside, to be able to enjoy them and to touch them! (this was allowed in the exhibition).
What do you think about?
3 comments:
I certainly enjoyed the exhibition too!! I was a bit reluctant to miss the class but when I was there, I really understood!
One had to see to understand!! How powerful his work is!
Hope you were in class today and realized the mistake you made in Maia's Blog! Ask him/her to correct it.
Do take care!
I think virginia refers to agreeing or disagreeing. In your comment you said: 'I'm agree with stillacer' and you shoud write 'I agree with stillacer'. This is a mistake that we have to know and virginia don't correct them, she only write us about we have a mistake. If you see some mistake like this in my comments, please tell me!! I'll try to correct...
I hope I help you!
Post a Comment